It has the familiar hooks and subplots that would be expected in a quest for ratings, but is that all bad when it floats out at least some of the book's main ideas in a palatable form, diluting yet expanding Huxley's reach? The movie DOES make many valid and thoughtful statements that just don't get a lot of airplay in this society and deserves credit for making some bold statements - especially right before commercials.
The characters, their motivations and dynamics have an air of familiarity in the TV world. This movie eases the uninitiated into awareness through a television medium with which they are familiar and can relate. even in small bites? The American public is deeply asleep in a shared symbolic consciousness that obliterates the real. Who needs these concepts more? Those who have already ascertained the game, muttering amongst themselves in coffee houses? Or those to whom the idea that this so-called reality is somehow "less" than the uncivilized world is a new idea and difficult to swallow. Coincidence? But who DOES read Shakespeare? Or for that matter, Huxley? If the movie were made true to it's original form, the intelligentsia would cheer and marvel just as they admired the original masterpiece, but what of those who need these insights the most? This movie reaches out to the brainwashed: the production / consumption units among us born and bred in the artifice of western civilization. This Hollywood makeover stylistically embodies many of the points made in the text the victory of shallowness over sincerity, style over substance, sloganism over communication - the movie is less than the book in so many of the ways that mankind is made less in the Brave New World.
0 kommentar(er)
